|
No
Logo - a Review Naomi Klein's best selling book
No Logo has been described as 'the Bible of anti-corporate
Militancy'. In it Klein sets out her thesis under
four headings:
·
No space - an account of the power of global brands.
·
No choice - concentration of power in retailing
leading to restriction of consumer choice.
· No jobs - as investment switches from investing
in production facilities and labour to spending
on marketing, mergers and brand management.
· No logo - how and why there is a political reaction
against global corporate power.
Klein's work is based on extensive research including
field studies of working conditions in the developing
countries. There is no doubt that she gives an
accurate account of a great deal of exploitative
corporate activity.
She
begins with a graphic account of de-industrialization
as it has affected the garment manufacturing district
of Toronto where erstwhile factories and workshops
are now being converted into loft style apartments
or workshops and business premises for artists,
graphic designers, yoga instructors or film producers.
(She evidently regards these occupations as in
some sense less worthy than making things. Nevertheless
as in London, New York or Paris these are the
types of occupation being followed by the sons
and daughters of those who once worked in the
manufacturing industries). The few workers left
in the garment trade are elderly and she contrasts
this with the youth of the garment workers in
countries like Indonesia who are working for sub
contractors of Nike, the Gap or Liz Claiborne,
earning less than US$2 a day. Here and elsewhere
in Asia she encountered working conditions very
similar to those which prevailed in the factories
and sweatshops of Britain and America around 100
years ago or in countries like Hong Kong or Singapore
less than 50 years ago.
She accuses multinational corporations such as
Coca-Cola, Microsoft, IBM, McDonalds and, above
all, Nike of being engaged in a process of 'mining
the planet's poorest back country for unimaginable
profits.'
The
migration of much manufacturing from the developed
to the developing world has undoubtedly led to
the exploitation of labour markets characterised
by low wages, poor working conditions and the
suppression of trades unions and the campaign
inspired by Klein's work to improve these conditions
is to be applauded. Nevertheless it must be recognised
that the companies involved have had to face the
stark alternative - either move manufacturing
to areas of low cost labour or go out of business,
as has indeed happened in the case of many clothing
manufacturing companies. Poor working conditions
in Europe and North America in the past did not
improve overnight. It took many decades of economic
growth, productivity gains, the rise of organized
labour, growing regulation of industry by governments
and the leadership of a few pioneering progressive
companies to produce the conditions that prevail
today. Hopefully, the process of improvement in
countries like Mexico or China can be worked through
in a shorter time frame, but this depends at least
as much on the policies and actions of national
governments and intergovernmental agencies than
on those of corporations.
Her central thesis is that as more people discover
the brand name secrets of 'the global logo web'
their outrage will fuel the next big political
movement 'a vast wave of opposition squarely targeting
transnational corporations, particularly those
with very high brand name recognition.
Her prime target is those companies with strong
international brands and which, as she sees it,
produce brands rather than products. Yet she weakens
her case by lumping together all large international
companies with strong brands, ignoring the fact
that there are hundreds of companies such as Mercedes,
Du Pont or GE that are heavily engaged in manufacturing
both in their home countries and overseas. She
is quite wrong in stating that brands were first
developed as a means of enabling consumers to
differentiate between mass-produced products that
were virtually indistinguishable from each other.
The brands I remember from childhood represented
goods and products that were quite distinctive
in their quality, and value for money. Names such
as Cadbury's, Mars, Ovaltine, Singer and Hoover
were bywords for quality and better than a written
guarantee. She also ignores the key role played
in a manufacturing process by product development
and design. Her description of what goes on is
confined to two activities - making the product
and marketing it. But before a product can be
made - whether it be a computer chip, a running
shoe or an automobile, it has to be designed and
developed and it is in the quality of that design
and the extent to which it meets consumer expectations
that the true value of the associated brand lies.
It is naïve in the extreme to believe that strong
brands can be built on the basis of advertising
and image building alone, although it is true
to say that to associate a product with a particular
lifestyle or set of aspirations can be an effective
marketing tool. In focusing as she does on Nike
she has picked a soft target. In this case it
may be justifiable to say that the brand is the
product. People don't buy trainers they buy Nike
and all the associations of sporting excellence
that have been built up around that brand. The
contrast between the wealth of Nike shareholders
and managers and, not least, the sportstars who
sponsor the product on the one hand and the young
persons who work in the many factories in the
developing countries understandably makes people
like Klein angry.
The
process of building an image of a particular lifestyle
or ideal around a product for marketing purposes
is not, however, a new one. Why, when we have
reason to celebrate do we order Champagne instead
of sparkling Chardonnay? It is because clever
marketing over many years has led us to associate
the brand name 'champagne' with success and happiness.
When we drink to the health of the happy couple
at a wedding reception from bottles costing up
to ten times the cost of a good sparkling wine
how many of us stop to think about the hourly
wage of the grape pickers on the estates of the
great chateaux? Brand symbols - logos - not only
act as a means of instant recognition to the prospective
purchaser, but also act as a badge of status once
purchased. Running right through Klein's book
is an underlying assumption that on balance global
companies do more harm than good. I would strongly
dispute this. To take just a few examples, the
cure for river blindness provided free of charge
by Merck, the bringing of cheap computing power
into millions of homes by companies like Dell,
and the joy on a young child's face on entering
Disneyworld are each, in different ways, benefits
that would not be possible without large scale
business. Philip Sadler Philip Sadler's book Building
Tomorrow's Company - A Guide to Sustainable Business
Success will be published early in 2002
|